Boots & Bonnetmaker

Is there any evidence that the Boots cannot be the maker of Bonnets and Hoods?

It has been said often enough (at least more than three times) that the Snark hunting party consists of ten members. All Snark readers had and have been given the choice to believe that, so why not. I have a choice too and decided that there only are nine members. I can do that because line #10 of Carroll’s problem either introduces a new Snark hunter, or it describes the Snark hunter who has been introduced in line #9. Here we have a clear ambiguity. Therefore we can choose what we like.

I assume that Carroll had created Boots as a portmanteau word in his tragicomical ballad The Hunting of the Snark (1876).

Acknowledgment: The idea that Boots could be a portmanteau for Bonnets and Hoods came from Wikipedia user “Carlo Fortunato” (2007-10-12 20:17 UTC):

I have always wondered if Carroll was using “Boots” as a portmanteau of “Bonnets and Hoods,” and if he using “Boots” to MEAN the Maker of Bonnets and Hoods. You will note that no Boots ever appears in any picture, but the maker of Bonnets does. Also, “Maker of Bonnets” doesn’t really begin with B.

The Boots and the maker of Bonnets and Hoods being the same person could explain, why Henry Holiday seemingly didn’t depict the Boots in his illustrations. But the maker of Bonnets and Hoods can be seen (partially) in one illustration shown above.

Below you find what Carroll’s said in his preface to his long poem about portmanteau words and how Carroll introduced the hunting party in the first chapter (the first “fit”) in The Hunting of the Snark. In the first chapter all members of the Snark hunting crew are introduced.

Questions:

  • Can the possibility that the crew consists of nine members be excluded?
  • Can the possibility that the crew consists of ten members be excluded?

 

From The Hunting of the Snark:

PREFACE

[…] This also seems a fitting occasion to notice the other hard words in that poem. Humpty-Dumpty’s theory, of two meanings packed into one word like a portmanteau, seems to me the right explanation for all.

For instance, take the two words “fuming” and “furious.” Make up your mind that you will say both words, but leave it unsettled which you will say first. Now open your mouth and speak. If your thoughts incline ever so little towards “fuming,” you will say “fuming-furious;” if they turn, by even a hair’s breadth, towards “furious,” you will say “furious-fuming;” but if you have the rarest of gifts, a perfectly balanced mind, you will say “frumious.”

Supposing that, when Pistol uttered the well-known words—

“Under which king, Bezonian? Speak or die!”

Justice Shallow had felt certain that it was either William or Richard, but had not been able to settle which, so that he could not possibly say either name before the other, can it be doubted that, rather than die, he would have gasped out “Rilchiam!”

 

Introduction of the Snark hunting party (with nine or ten members):

Fit the First
THE LANDING

001     “Just the place for a Snark!” the Bellman cried,
002         As he landed his crew with care;
003     Supporting each man on the top of the tide
004         By a finger entwined in his hair.

005     “Just the place for a Snark! I have said it twice:
006         That alone should encourage the crew.
007     Just the place for a Snark! I have said it thrice:
008             What I tell you three times is true.”

009     The crew was complete: it included a Boots
010         A maker of Bonnets and Hoods
011     A Barrister, brought to arrange their disputes —
012         And a Broker, to value their goods.

013     A Billiard-marker, whose skill was immense,
014         Might perhaps have won more than his share —
015     But a Banker, engaged at enormous expense,
016         Had the whole of their cash in his care.

017     There was also a Beaver, that paced on the deck,
018         Or would sit making lace in the bow:
019     And had often (the Bellman said) saved them from wreck,
020         Though none of the sailors knew how.

[introduction of the Baker]
021     There was one who was famed for the number of things
022         He forgot when he entered the ship:
023     His umbrella, his watch, all his jewels and rings,
024         And the clothes he had bought for the trip.

025     He had forty-two boxes, all carefully packed,
026         With his name painted clearly on each:
027     But, since he omitted to mention the fact,
028         They were all left behind on the beach.

029     The loss of his clothes hardly mattered, because
030         He had seven coats on when he came,
031     With three pairs of boots —but the worst of it was,
032         He had wholly forgotten his name.

033     He would answer to “Hi!” or to any loud cry,
034         Such as “Fry me!” or “Fritter my wig!”
035     To “What-you-may-call-um!” or “What-was-his-name!”
036         But especially “Thing-um-a-jig!”

037     While, for those who preferred a more forcible word,
038         He had different names from these:
039     His intimate friends called him “Candle-ends,”
040         And his enemies “Toasted-cheese.”

041         “His form is ungainly —his intellect small —”
042     (So the Bellman would often remark)
043     “But his courage is perfect! And that, after all,
044         Is the thing that one needs with a Snark.”

045     He would joke with hyenas, returning their stare
046         With an impudent wag of the head:
047     And he once went a walk, paw-in-paw, with a bear,
048         “Just to keep up its spirits,” he said.

049     He came as a Baker: but owned, when too late —
050         And it drove the poor Bellman half-mad —
051     He could only bake Bridecake —for which, I may state,
052         No materials were to be had.

[introduction of the Butcher]
053     The last of the crew needs especial remark,
054         Though he looked an incredible dunce:
055     He had just one idea —but, that one being “Snark,”
056         The good Bellman engaged him at once.

057     He came as a Butcher: but gravely declared,
058         When the ship had been sailing a week,
059     He could only kill Beavers. The Bellman looked scared,
060         And was almost too frightened to speak:

061     But at length he explained, in a tremulous tone,
062         There was only one Beaver on board;
063     And that was a tame one he had of his own,
064         Whose death would be deeply deplored.

065     The Beaver, who happened to hear the remark,
066         Protested, with tears in its eyes,
067     That not even the rapture of hunting the Snark
068         Could atone for that dismal surprise!

069     It strongly advised that the Butcher should be
070         Conveyed in a separate ship:
071     But the Bellman declared that would never agree
072         With the plans he had made for the trip:

073     Navigation was always a difficult art,
074         Though with only one ship and one bell:
075     And he feared he must really decline, for his part,
076         Undertaking another as well.

077     The Beaver’s best course was, no doubt, to procure
078         A second-hand dagger-proof coat —
079     So the Baker advised it — and next, to insure
080         Its life in some Office of note:

081     This the Banker suggested, and offered for hire
082         (On moderate terms), or for sale,
083     Two excellent Policies, one Against Fire,
084         And one Against Damage From Hail.

085     Yet still, ever after that sorrowful day,
086         Whenever the Butcher was by,
087     The Beaver kept looking the opposite way,
088         And appeared unaccountably shy.

 

More about the Boots (again from the PREFACE) in a footnote:

The Bellman, who was almost morbidly sensitive about appearances, used to have the bowsprit unshipped once or twice a week to be revarnished, and it more than once happened, when the time came for replacing it, that no one on board could remember which end of the ship it belonged to. They knew it was not of the slightest use to appeal to the Bellman about it— he would only refer to his Naval Code, and read out in pathetic tones Admiralty Instructions which none of them had ever been able to understand— so it generally ended in its being fastened on, anyhow, across the rudder. The helmsman¹ used to stand by with tears in his eyes; he knew it was all wrong, but alas! Rule 42 of the Code, “No one shall speak to the Man at the Helm,” had been completed by the Bellman himself with the words “and the Man at the Helm shall speak to no one.“ So remonstrance was impossible, and no steering could be done till the next varnishing day. During these bewildering intervals the ship usually sailed backwards.

¹ This office was usually undertaken by the Boots, who found in it a refuge from the Baker’s constant complaints about the insufficient blacking of his three pairs of boots.

This means that the helmsman usually was the Boots, who had to unship the bowsprit once or twice a week to be revarnished. What does Carroll’s ballad tell us about the Bonnetmaker and the Boots?

009     The crew was complete: it included a Boots—
010         A maker of Bonnets and Hoods—
011     A Barrister, brought to arrange their disputes—
012         And a Broker, to value their goods.

109     He [Bellman] was thoughtful and grave—but the orders he gave
110         Were enough to bewilder a crew.
111     When he cried “Steer to starboard, but keep her headlarboard!”
112         What on earth was the helmsman [Boots] to do?

273     The Boots and the Broker were sharpening a spade—
274         Each working the grindstone in turn:
275     But the Beaver went on making lace, and displayed
276         No interest in the concern:

281     The maker of Bonnets ferociously planned
282         A novel arrangement of bows:
283     While the Billiard-marker with quivering hand
284         Was chalking the tip of his nose.